Nodot \u012bpa\u0161uma ties\u012bbas citai personai var da\u017e\u0101dos veidos. Izplat\u012bt\u0101kie ir p\u0101rdevuma un d\u0101vin\u0101juma dar\u012bjumi. Ir vair\u0101ki faktori, kas j\u0101\u0146em v\u0113r\u0101, izv\u0113loties \u0161\u0101du dar\u012bjumu k\u0101rtot k\u0101 d\u0101vin\u0101jumu.<\/p>\n\n
Pirms d\u0101vin\u0101juma dar\u012bjuma sl\u0113g\u0161anas ir svar\u012bgi uzdot sev jaut\u0101jumus: k\u0101d\u0113\u013c? un kas no t\u0101 izriet? K\u0101 liecina prakse, dar\u012bjuma dal\u012bbnieki visbie\u017e\u0101k r\u012bkojas aiz merkantiliem apsv\u0113rumiem. Saska\u0146\u0101 ar past\u0101vo\u0161o likumdo\u0161anu, d\u0101vinot tuviem radiniekiem valsts nodeva ir 0.5%, bet p\u0101rdodot \u2013 2% no \u012bpa\u0161uma v\u0113rt\u012bbas. Ja \u012bpa\u0161uma v\u0113rt\u012bba ir liela, \u0161\u012b summa var b\u016bt v\u0113r\u0101 \u0146emama.<\/p>\n\n
\u013boti svar\u012bgi ir izp\u0113t\u012bt konkr\u0113to situ\u0101ciju, konsult\u0113ties ar speci\u0101listiem. Pirmk\u0101rt, d\u0101vin\u0101jumu, saska\u0146\u0101 ar sp\u0113k\u0101 eso\u0161o likumdo\u0161anu d\u0101vin\u0101t\u0101js var atsaukt apd\u0101vin\u0101t\u0101 rupjas nepateic\u012bbas d\u0113\u013c. D\u0101vanas da\u013cu var atpras\u012bt mantinieki, kuriem ar \u0161o d\u0101vin\u0101jumu at\u0146emta neatraid\u0101m\u0101, p\u0113c likuma vi\u0146iem pien\u0101ko\u0161\u0101s mantojuma da\u013ca, k\u0101 ar\u012b d\u0101vin\u0101t\u0101ja kreditori, kas apgalvo, ka \u012bpa\u0161uma d\u0101vin\u0101jums noticis, lai izvair\u012btos no par\u0101du samaksas. T\u0101du dar\u012bjumu var atz\u012bt par sp\u0113k\u0101 neeso\u0161u, motiv\u0113jot to ar faktu, ka d\u0101vin\u0101t\u0101js k\u0101 par\u0101dnieks (vai pat atbild\u0113t\u0101js civilproces\u0101), t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di \u201cticis va\u013c\u0101\u201d no \u012bpa\u0161uma, pret kuru var\u0113tu v\u0113rst piedzi\u0146u.<\/p>\n\n
J\u0101\u0146em v\u0113r\u0101, ka past\u0101v divi d\u0101vin\u0101jumu veidi: d\u0101vin\u0101jums vienk\u0101r\u0161i k\u0101 d\u0101vin\u0101jums un d\u0101vin\u0101jums k\u0101 atl\u012bdz\u012bba par sniegtajiem pakalpojumiem. At\u0161\u0137ir\u012bba ir t\u0101, ka d\u0101vin\u0101jumu k\u0101 atl\u012bdz\u012bbu par sniegtajiem pakalpojumiem nevar atsaukt (!), bet parastu d\u0101vin\u0101jumu d\u0101vin\u0101t\u0101js var atpras\u012bt, ja apd\u0101vin\u0101tais izr\u0101d\u012bjis rupju nepateic\u012bbu. Tom\u0113r j\u0101saprot, ka atl\u012bdz\u012bba nenoz\u012bm\u0113 samaksu (tad tas b\u016btu cita veida dar\u012bjums).<\/p>\n\n
Svar\u012bgs moments ir ar\u012b d\u0101vin\u0101m\u0101 dz\u012bvok\u013ca statusa noteik\u0161ana. \u013boti daudz dz\u012bvok\u013cu joproj\u0101m nav re\u0123istr\u0113ti zemesgr\u0101mat\u0101s. Dokuments, kas apliecina \u012bpa\u0161uma ties\u012bbas uz \u0161\u0101diem dz\u012bvok\u013ciem ir t\u0101 saukt\u0101 \u201cza\u013c\u0101 lapa\u201d (apliec\u012bba par \u012bpa\u0161uma ties\u012bb\u0101m uz dz\u012bvokli l\u012bdz dz\u012bvojam\u0101s m\u0101jas privatiz\u0101cijai) vai \u201cdzelten\u0101 lapa\u201d (pagaidu apliec\u012bba par \u012bpa\u0161uma ties\u012bb\u0101m uz dz\u012bvokli). Sl\u0113dzot jebk\u0101du dar\u012bjumu par \u012bpa\u0161uma ties\u012bbu p\u0101reju \u2013 taj\u0101 skait\u0101 d\u0101vin\u0101jumu \u2013 prec\u012bzi j\u0101zin, kas konkr\u0113taj\u0101 br\u012bd\u012b notiek ar nekustamo \u012bpa\u0161umu. Piem\u0113rs no prakses: puses nolemj nosl\u0113gt d\u0101vin\u0101juma dar\u012bjumu. \u012apa\u0161uma ties\u012bbu dokuments ir \u201cdzelten\u0101 lapa\u201d (kooperat\u012bva dz\u012bvoklis). Puses dodas pie not\u0101ra un tur noskaidrojas, ka re\u0123istr\u0113t apd\u0101vin\u0101t\u0101 \u012bpa\u0161uma ties\u012bbas nevar, jo sp\u0113k\u0101 eso\u0161\u0101 likumdo\u0161ana paredz ierobe\u017eojumu \u2013 \u0161o dz\u012bvokli nedr\u012bkst nodot \u012bpa\u0161um\u0101 citai personai, jo visa m\u0101ja, kur\u0101 tas atrodas, jau ir ierakst\u012bta zemesgr\u0101mat\u0101. \u0160\u0101d\u0101 situ\u0101cij\u0101 likums uzliek pien\u0101kumu \u012bpa\u0161niekam vispirms nostiprin\u0101t savas \u012bpa\u0161uma ties\u012bbas zemesgr\u0101mat\u0101 (vesela darb\u012bbu virkne: inventariz\u0101cijas lietas un uzzi\u0146as par kadastr\u0101lo v\u0113rt\u012bbu sa\u0146em\u0161ana, nostiprin\u0101juma l\u016bguma par \u012bpa\u0161uma ties\u012bbu nostiprin\u0101\u0161anu zemesgr\u0101mat\u0101 parakst\u012b\u0161ana pie not\u0101ra, nodevu samaksa), un tikai pec tam, vadoties no Civillikuma norm\u0101m, nodot \u012bpa\u0161uma ties\u012bbas citai personai.<\/p>\n\n
D\u0101vin\u0101jumu var veikt ar\u012b tad, ja \u012bpa\u0161umam ir da\u017e\u0101di apgr\u016btin\u0101jumi. Tom\u0113r ir skaidrs, ka gad\u012bjum\u0101 ar dz\u012bvokli sevi maksim\u0101li j\u0101nodro\u0161ina pret iesp\u0113jam\u0101m saist\u012bb\u0101m pret tre\u0161aj\u0101m person\u0101m.<\/p>\n\n
D\u0101vinot dz\u012bvok\u013cus, bie\u017ei vien ir svar\u012bgi \u0146emt v\u0113r\u0101 \u0161aj\u0101 dz\u012bvokl\u012b dz\u012bvojo\u0161o personu ties\u012bbas. T\u0101da veida d\u0101vin\u0101jums ar\u012b ir paredz\u0113ts Civilproces\u0101. \u0160aj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 d\u0101vin\u0101juma l\u012bgum\u0101 puses nosaka, ka, piem\u0113ram, d\u0101vin\u0101t\u0101jam (gados vecam cilv\u0113kam) ir ties\u012bbas l\u012bdz savas dz\u012bves beig\u0101m dz\u012bvot \u0161aj\u0101 dz\u012bvokl\u012b un izmantot to l\u012bdztekus \u012bpa\u0161niekam.<\/p>\n\n
K\u0101 jebkur\u0101 l\u012bgum\u0101, v\u0113lams nor\u0101d\u012bt, ka t\u0101 parakst\u012b\u0161ana ir pu\u0161u br\u012bvas gribas izpausmes rezult\u0101ts, kas izdar\u012bts bez viltus, mald\u012bbas vai draudiem. Tas t\u0101p\u0113c, ka Latvijas Republikas Civillikums paredz dar\u012bjuma dal\u012bbnieku un tre\u0161o personu intere\u0161u aizsardz\u012bbu no taml\u012bdz\u012bgiem ekscesiem. Dar\u012bjums var tikt atz\u012bts par sp\u0113k\u0101 neeso\u0161u, ja tiks pier\u0101d\u012bts viltus, svar\u012bgas mald\u012bbas vai spaidu fakts. Fr\u0101ze par to, ka puses br\u012bvi pau\u017e savu gribu (k\u0101 ar\u012b fakts, ka pu\u0161u paraksti ir zv\u0113rin\u0101ta not\u0101ra apliecin\u0101ti vai ar\u012b vi\u0146\u0161 apliecin\u0101jis l\u012bgumu uzr\u0101d\u012bjuma k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101) b\u016btiski mazina \u0161\u0101du risku.<\/p>\n\n
D\u0101vin\u0101jums ir \u013coti bie\u017ei praktiz\u0113ts dar\u012bjuma veids. T\u0101ds dar\u012bjums rada nopietnas juridiskas sekas k\u0101 t\u0101 dal\u012bbniekiem, t\u0101 ar\u012b tre\u0161aj\u0101m person\u0101m. K\u0101 jebkuru citu dar\u012bjumu, d\u0101vin\u0101jums j\u0101izskata kompleksi ar t\u0101 dal\u012bbnieku tiesiskaj\u0101m attiec\u012bb\u0101m un atbilsto\u0161i j\u0101nosaka t\u0101 nosac\u012bjumi, lai ar \u0161o dar\u012bjumu tiktu sasniegts v\u0113lamais rezult\u0101ts un nov\u0113rstu probl\u0113mas, kas var rasties pu\u0161u neuzman\u012bbas d\u0113\u013c.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Nodot \u012bpa\u0161uma ties\u012bbas citai personai var da\u017e\u0101dos veidos. Izplat\u012bt\u0101kie ir p\u0101rdevuma un d\u0101vin\u0101juma dar\u012bjumi. Ir vair\u0101ki faktori, kas j\u0101\u0146em v\u0113r\u0101, izv\u0113loties \u0161\u0101du dar\u012bjumu k\u0101rtot k\u0101 d\u0101vin\u0101jumu. Pirms d\u0101vin\u0101juma dar\u012bjuma sl\u0113g\u0161anas ir svar\u012bgi uzdot sev jaut\u0101jumus: k\u0101d\u0113\u013c? un kas no t\u0101 izriet? K\u0101 liecina prakse, dar\u012bjuma dal\u012bbnieki visbie\u017e\u0101k r\u012bkojas aiz merkantiliem apsv\u0113rumiem. Saska\u0146\u0101 ar past\u0101vo\u0161o likumdo\u0161anu, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","yoast_head":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n