{"id":1362,"date":"2020-03-13T12:32:00","date_gmt":"2020-03-13T09:32:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.inlatplus.lv\/lv\/?post_type=publication&p=1362"},"modified":"2020-03-18T15:42:34","modified_gmt":"2020-03-18T12:42:34","slug":"gazes-piegadatajs-izstadija-rekinu-par-astronomisku-summu-skaititaja-bojajumu-del-vai-tas-ir-likumigi","status":"publish","type":"publication","link":"https:\/\/www.inlatplus.lv\/lv\/archives\/publication\/gazes-piegadatajs-izstadija-rekinu-par-astronomisku-summu-skaititaja-bojajumu-del-vai-tas-ir-likumigi","title":{"rendered":"G\u0101zes pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101js izst\u0101d\u012bja r\u0113\u0137inu par \u201castronomisku\u201d summu skait\u012bt\u0101ja boj\u0101jumu d\u0113\u013c! Vai tas ir likum\u012bgi?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n

Daudzi Latvijas iedz\u012bvot\u0101ji un uz\u0146\u0113mumi ir sask\u0101ru\u0161ies ar nepat\u012bkamu situ\u0101ciju. Pirms gada vai pusotru gada vi\u0146i nomain\u012bja g\u0101zes skait\u012bt\u0101jus sav\u0101 objekt\u0101, bet \u0161odien vi\u0146i p\u0113k\u0161\u0146i sa\u0146\u0113ma no g\u0101zes pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ja s\u016bdz\u012bbu, kur\u0101 teikts, ka no\u0146emtais skait\u012bt\u0101js tika nodots p\u0101rbaudei, un ekspert\u012bzes laik\u0101 ir konstat\u0113ti plombas boj\u0101jumi (piem\u0113ram, skrambas), kas, p\u0113c eksperta dom\u0101m, nor\u0101da uz m\u0113\u0123in\u0101jumu iejaukties skait\u012bt\u0101ja darb\u012bb\u0101.<\/p>\n\n

Un tad, pamatojoties uz \u0161o ekspert\u012bzi un vadoties p\u0113c Ministru kabineta noteikumiem Nr.78 \u201cDabasg\u0101zes tirdzniec\u012bbas un lieto\u0161anas noteikumi\u201d, pakalpojumu sniedz\u0113js pieprasa pat\u0113r\u0113t\u0101jam samaks\u0101t \u013coti iev\u0113rojamu summu, kas tiek noteikta un pras\u012bb\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012bta k\u0101 \u201cg\u0101zes pat\u0113ri\u0146a p\u0101rr\u0113\u0137ins\u201d.<\/p>\n\n

Saska\u0146\u0101 ar \u0161o noteikumu 89.punktu, p\u0101rr\u0113\u0137ina summa tiek apr\u0113\u0137in\u0101ta \u0161\u0101di. Par pamatu tiek \u0146emta g\u0101zes skait\u012bt\u0101ja maksim\u0101l\u0101 caurlaidsp\u0113ja (kubikmetri stund\u0101), kas tiek reizin\u0101ta ar 24 stund\u0101m, p\u0113c tam ar dienu skaitu nor\u0113\u0137inu period\u0101. Tad no sa\u0146emt\u0101 reizin\u0101juma tiek atskait\u012bta summa, kuru pat\u0113r\u0113t\u0101js jau ir samaks\u0101jis par g\u0101zi \u0161aj\u0101 nor\u0113\u0137inu period\u0101. Ieg\u016bt\u0101 starp\u012bba tiek reizin\u0101ta ar tarifu, kas bija sp\u0113k\u0101 taj\u0101 m\u0113nes\u012b, kad pat\u0113r\u0113t\u0101js pat\u0113r\u0113jam no\u0146\u0113ma skait\u012bt\u0101ja r\u0101d\u012bjumus, un tad produkts tiek reizin\u0101ts v\u0113l ar diviem. Rezult\u0101ts ir “astronomisk\u0101” summa, kuru g\u0101zes pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101js pieprasa apmaks\u0101t lietot\u0101jam.<\/p>\n\n

\u0160\u0101ds apr\u0113\u0137ins, k\u0101 likums, tiek veikts pareizi, ta\u010du nav iesp\u0113jams piekrist visiem pamatojumiem, kas nor\u0101d\u012bti g\u0101zes pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ja piepras\u012bjum\u0101.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n

Min\u0113to noteikumu 87.punkts, uz kuru atsaucas g\u0101zes pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101js izst\u0101dot pretenziju, skan \u0161\u0101di: \u201eJa, p\u0101rbaudot lietot\u0101ja dabasg\u0101zes sist\u0113mu, sadales sist\u0113mas operators konstat\u0113, ka patva\u013c\u012bgi ier\u012bkots piesl\u0113gums pirms komercuzskaites m\u0113rapar\u0101ta vai lietot\u0101js dabasg\u0101zi lieto bez komercuzskaites m\u0113rapar\u0101ta, vai komercuzskaites m\u0113rapar\u0101ts vai plomba ir boj\u0101ta un k\u0101das min\u0113t\u0101s darb\u012bbas d\u0113\u013c ir samazin\u0101ts dabasg\u0101zes pat\u0113ri\u0146a r\u0101d\u012bjuma lielums vai rad\u012bta iesp\u0113ja dabasg\u0101zi lietot bez maksas, sist\u0113mas operators par konstat\u0113to faktu sast\u0101da aktu divos eksempl\u0101ros. Vienu akta eksempl\u0101ru glab\u0101 sadales sist\u0113mas operators, otrs tiek nodots lietot\u0101jam vai t\u0101 p\u0101rst\u0101vim.\u201d Pamatojoties uz \u0161\u0101da akta tiek izveidots lietot\u0101jam adres\u0113ts piepras\u012bjums samaks\u0101t iev\u0113rojamas summas. <\/p>\n\n

T\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di, p\u0113c g\u0101zes pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ja dom\u0101m, ir pietiekami piefiks\u0113t skait\u012bt\u0101ja vai plombas boj\u0101jumu faktu, veicot atbilsto\u0161u ekspert\u012bzi, kas var liecin\u0101t par m\u0113\u0123in\u0101jumu iejaukties skait\u012bt\u0101ja darb\u012bb\u0101, nol\u016bk\u0101 g\u0101zi izmantot bez maksas, un tas jau ir iemesls pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101jam izst\u0101d\u012bt lietot\u0101jam pretenziju ar pras\u012bbu samaks\u0101t g\u0101zes pat\u0113ri\u0146a p\u0101rr\u0113\u0137inu par periodu, kas tiek apr\u0113\u0137in\u0101ts par gadu pirms skait\u012bt\u0101ja no\u0146em\u0161anas.<\/p>\n\n

G\u0101zes pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ja veiktaj\u0101 ekspert\u012bz\u0113 netiek uzdots jaut\u0101jums, cik sen plomba tika boj\u0101ta, vai \u0161ie boj\u0101jumi nor\u0101da uz re\u0101lu iejauk\u0161anos skait\u012bt\u0101ja darb\u012bb\u0101 un k\u0101di g\u0101zes apjomi tika zaud\u0113ti (un ne tikai par iesp\u0113jamu m\u0113\u0123in\u0101jumu vai net\u012b\u0161u boj\u0101jumu). Taj\u0101 pa\u0161\u0101 laik\u0101 tiek ignor\u0113ts fakts, ka vis\u0101 \u0161\u012b skait\u012bt\u0101ja darb\u012bbas laik\u0101 g\u0101zes pat\u0113ri\u0146\u0161 bija vienm\u0113r\u012bgs, pat\u0113ri\u0146a apjoms nesamazin\u0101j\u0101s. Tas ir, pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ju nemaz neinteres\u0113, vai ir notikusi g\u0101zes z\u0101dz\u012bba, vai skait\u012bt\u0101ja\/plombas boj\u0101juma raksturs nor\u0101da uz rad\u012bto iesp\u0113ju pat\u0113r\u0113t g\u0101zi bez maksas. Vai ir boj\u0101jumi uz plombas vai uz skait\u012bt\u0101ja? Tad maks\u0101!<\/p>\n\n

Ministru kabineta noteikumu Nr.78 \u201cDabasg\u0101zes tirdzniec\u012bbas un lieto\u0161anas noteikumi\u201d 87.punkts tiek izmantots tikai t\u0101d\u0113\u013c, lai apr\u0113\u0137in\u0101tu pras\u012bjuma summu un izst\u0101d\u012bt to g\u0101zes lietot\u0101jam apmaksai. Vainas noteik\u0161anai nepietiek tikai ar skait\u012bt\u0101ja\/plombas boj\u0101juma fakta fiks\u0113\u0161anu un p\u0101rr\u0113\u0137ina veik\u0161anu. \u0160aj\u0101 situ\u0101cij\u0101 b\u016btu lo\u0123iski un pareizi:<\/p>\n\n

a) fiks\u0113t skait\u012bt\u0101ja vai plombas boj\u0101juma negat\u012bv\u0101s sekas (skait\u012bt\u0101ja r\u0101d\u012bjumu samazin\u0101\u0161an\u0101s, fakts, ka tiek rad\u012bta iesp\u0113ja izmantot g\u0101zi bez maksas vai g\u0101zes z\u0101dz\u012bba);<\/p>\n\n

b) noteikt c\u0113lo\u0146sakar\u012bbu starp plombas boj\u0101juma faktu un iepriek\u0161min\u0113taj\u0101m negat\u012bvaj\u0101m sek\u0101m.<\/p>\n\n

Tikai ar Ministru kabineta noteikumu izmanto\u0161anu nepietiek, lai noteiktu vainu un pamatotu g\u0101zes pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ja pras\u012bbas samaks\u0101t apr\u0113\u0137in\u0101to p\u0101rr\u0113\u0137inu.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n

Tom\u0113r pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101js veiksm\u012bgi piem\u0113ro \u0161o praksi. Patie\u0161\u0101m, tie pa\u0161i Ministru kabineta noteikumi Nr.78, g\u0101zes pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101jam k\u0101 g\u0101zes sadales sist\u0113mas operatoram, nosaka ties\u012bbas nekav\u0113joties p\u0101rtraukt g\u0101zes pieg\u0101di, ja ir atkl\u0101ts p\u0101rk\u0101pums, kura d\u0113\u013c lietot\u0101jam ir samazin\u0101jies apr\u0113\u0137in\u0101t\u0101s g\u0101zes daudzums vai tika rad\u012bta iesp\u0113ja pat\u0113r\u0113t g\u0101zi bez maksas. T\u0101p\u0113c, ja lietot\u0101js nepiekr\u012bt pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ja pras\u012bbai, past\u0101v g\u0101zes pieg\u0101des p\u0101rtraukuma risks, kas var iev\u0113rojami kait\u0113t uz\u0146\u0113muma darb\u012bbai vai priv\u0101ta objekta darb\u012bbai.<\/p>\n\n

T\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di pat\u0113r\u0113t\u0101js \u0161aj\u0101 situ\u0101cij\u0101 ir nost\u0101d\u012bts izv\u0113les priek\u0161\u0101: vai nu aizst\u0101v\u0113t savu nevain\u012bgumu ties\u0101, vienlaikus risk\u0113jot palikt bez g\u0101zes uz visu tiesas procesu laiku, vai ar\u012b nosl\u0113gt mierizl\u012bgumu ar g\u0101zes pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ju, samaks\u0101jot tamm da\u013cu no apr\u0113\u0137in\u0101t\u0101s p\u0101rr\u0113\u0137ina summas.<\/p>\n\n

Tom\u0113r ar to ir iesp\u0113jams c\u012bn\u012bties, jo p\u0113d\u0113jais v\u0101rds vienm\u0113r paliek tiesne\u0161a zi\u0146\u0101, un b\u016btu netaisn\u012bgi uzlikt uz k\u0101da atbild\u012bbu par p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, ko \u0161\u012b persona nav izdar\u012bjusi. Pirmstiesas process ir ar\u012b laba iesp\u0113ja pier\u0101d\u012bt, ka neesat iesaist\u012bts p\u0101rk\u0101pum\u0101, un atrisin\u0101t str\u012bdu ar g\u0101zes pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ju uz abpus\u0113ji izdev\u012bgiem nosac\u012bjumiem. Pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ja pras\u012bba ir tikai vienas puses viedoklis, kuram var nepiekrist un aizst\u0101v\u0113t savu poz\u012bciju l\u012bdz galam.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Daudzi Latvijas iedz\u012bvot\u0101ji un uz\u0146\u0113mumi ir sask\u0101ru\u0161ies ar nepat\u012bkamu situ\u0101ciju. Pirms gada vai pusotru gada vi\u0146i nomain\u012bja g\u0101zes skait\u012bt\u0101jus sav\u0101 objekt\u0101, bet \u0161odien vi\u0146i p\u0113k\u0161\u0146i sa\u0146\u0113ma no g\u0101zes pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ja s\u016bdz\u012bbu, kur\u0101 teikts, ka no\u0146emtais skait\u012bt\u0101js tika nodots p\u0101rbaudei, un ekspert\u012bzes laik\u0101 ir konstat\u0113ti plombas boj\u0101jumi (piem\u0113ram, skrambas), kas, p\u0113c eksperta dom\u0101m, nor\u0101da uz m\u0113\u0123in\u0101jumu iejaukties […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","yoast_head":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n